The age of criminal responsibility acts as the gateway to the criminal justice system - under a certain age you are kept out most jurisdictions have this age barrier because it's widely. Parents that tell us they are not responsible for the negative actions of their children are indirectly telling us that they haven't done a vital part of the parenting role: positive teaching it is true that we cannot be everywhere are children roam. The parents should not be held responsible for their children's actions children have control over their own mind no one is making them do anything they could have the best parents or even the worst and still do the things that they do.
Background and context at the outset it must be noted that parental responsibility means different things in different contexts in the united states and parts of canada parental responsibility will often refer to a kind of law that hold parents legally accountable for the actions of their children. In this day and age, this phenomenon that the legal responsibility for children's activities is the task for their parents has become a controversial debate among the public in around the world the parents should be held legally responsible for their children's actions. If parents are given the freedom to correct their children in the way they think best, then they should be held responsible for their children's actions they would also have to undergo punishment if the children are too young to bear the consequences of their actions.
While parents have the right to make important decisions about their children's lives, they also have certain legal duties parents are legally required to support their minor children supporting your kids includes providing food, clothing, shelter, and basic care. It's a noble sentiment, but can parents be held responsible for their child's actions online it's an interesting question, and one that the german courts have been trying to tackle since 2007 at that time, a couple's 13-year-old son had uploaded over 1,000 songs to various file-sharing networks. If one's child commits the crime, unless the parent directly took part in the illegal activity associated with their child, the parent should without a doubt never be held responsible - not morally, emotionally or legally - for this crime. Should their parents be considered morally and legally responsible for those deaths there is certainly an age where children can tell the difference between right and wrong, and between morally acceptable and unacceptable behavior. But if parents fail to take these steps and their child bullies others, should the parents themselves be held criminally responsible latest attempt at accountability an ordinance approved last month by the monona, wisconsin, common council allows parents of children who bully to be fined $114.
Although parents are responsible for raising and teaching their children what is right or wrong, parents should not be held responsible for the crimes of their children because they did not commit the crime and if they are not present at the crime scene. Parents' liability for their children's actions parental liability only applies to your minor or underage children the age of majority is the age at which a minor, in the eyes of the state law, becomes an adult. With biological children, the apple doesn't fall far from the tree however, when you bring children into the world, the parent should care for him/her until they. In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that the parents are solely and legally responsible for their children's actfurther, it is expected that the people make cognizance of the fact and teach their children good values and moral responsibilities. But, he added, morally speaking and from my experience as an elder law attorney who deals with children of elderly parents all the time, i do believe that children have a moral obligation to do.
From the outset, it is the belief of some that parents should be held accountable for their children's crimes because parents are largely responsible for the education of their children and often influence the child's actions and behavior when the child is older. Should parents be held legally responsible for their children s actions in life, parents are their child's first and most important teachers obedience has become less important. Proprietarianists argue, given that parents in some sense produce their children, that children are the property of their parents in some sense of the term aristotle held this type of view, insofar as he takes children and slaves to be property of the father ( nicomachean ethics , 1134b.
To conclude, the statement parents should be held legally responsible for their children's activities is very right children notice every action their parents do and hence do the same in my opinion, parents should give more time to their children and focus on their every activity. - an on going debate all over the world is being held about if parents should be legally responsible for their children's behavior this meaning when a child is charged for a crime they will not receive the punishment, instead the parents will. In 1996, a new york times/cbs poll asked respondents if parents should be held responsible for the crimes committed by their school age children 72 percent of the respondents said yes. Check out our top free essays on parents should be held morally and legally responsible for the actions and needs of their children to help you write your own essay free essays on parents should be held morally and legally responsible for the actions and needs of their children - brainiacom.
When are parents legally responsible for the actions of their children 2014 mlive media group mlivecom 2011 nov a parent can't be made to pay the price for a child's actions unless it is proven that the parent knowingly engaged in a bad act. Children learn from seeing and hearing things that their parents do and say and parents should teach their children to stop making excuses and start taking the blame for their actions parents are their children's role models, leaders therefore that makes them morally and legally responsible for what they do. While there are some issues that are biologically or chemically rooted, most of the concerns that parents bring are confounded by their own actions to start, children are like sponges that absorb everything around them, for better or worse. Parents should be charged before the courts and held responsible for their children's illegal activities, dna leader branville mccartney said yesterday.
So i believe parents should not be held accountable for their children's actions because blaming parents is not going to help children learn from their mistakes advocates who subscribe to full parental accountability stated, they believe parents should know about and control their children's actions and accept their obligation to bear. Thus concluding that parents should be legally responsible for their child's behavior and thinking the second reason is that parent's actions are inculcated into the child for example, my father is a businessman and it was his rule that never cheat on customers, when i opened my business, invariantly i included it as a rule of thumb. The argument being these laws punish the parents for their children's actions in some cases, the laws aren't about parental negligence, but based on the fact parents are responsible for a child and it is the child that has committed the crime or caused the damage.